Bang Si-hyuk, the visionary behind HYBE and BTS, is caught up in a major IPO stock fraud investigation. As a result, South Korean authorities have imposed a travel ban on Bang Si-hyuk from leaving the country. If you want to understand what’s happening to one of K-pop’s top figures, keep reading — this is a story that affects millions of fans worldwide.
HYBE Founder Bang Si Hyuk Faces Travel Ban Over IPO Fraud Claims
Who is Bang Si Hyuk?
Bang Si-hyuk, known as “Hitman Bang,” is the founder and chairman of HYBE Corporation, formerly known as Big Hit Entertainment. He is recognized for his innovative approach to the music business.
Before launching HYBE, Bang was a successful composer and producer at JYP Entertainment, one of Korea’s “Big Three” agencies, where he co-wrote hits for major artists.
He founded Big Hit Entertainment in 2005. The company’s global prominence is closely linked to BTS, the seven-member boy band that has topped the U.S. Billboard 200 chart multiple times and become a cultural phenomenon worldwide.
Later, Bang Si-hyuk officially rebranded the company as HYBE in March 2021. With a new name and organizational structure, the company has grown into one of South Korea’s leading music labels and entertainment agencies. His vision has driven HYBE’s evolution into a multifaceted entertainment and lifestyle platform. The company expanded internationally with subsidiaries in Japan, the U.S., and Latin America.
The company also grew through significant acquisitions, such as Ithaca Holdings—the management company behind Justin Bieber and Ariana Grande—in a deal valued at over $1 billion.
Under his leadership, HYBE went public in 2020 in South Korea’s largest IPO in three years, propelling Bang into billionaire status and making him the only billionaire in the country’s entertainment industry.
According to Forbes, Bang ranks 16th among South Korea’s 50 richest people in 2025. As of October 1, 2025, his real-time net worth is US$2.4 billion. This places him at number 1,640 on the list of the world’s richest individuals today.
The HYBE IPO Scandal Explained: A $140 Million Accusation
The founder of HYBE, Bang Si-hyuk, is under a government investigation for alleged fraud connected to HYBE’s 2020 IPO. Police say Bang may have misled shareholders before HYBE went public.
Police say Bang may have misled shareholders before HYBE went public. He is accused of telling early investors in 2019 that there were no plans for an IPO, prompting them to sell their shares cheaply to a special purpose company (SPC) linked to HYBE executives.
Once HYBE went public in 2020, the SPC sold those shares for big profits. Bang allegedly gained about 30% of the proceeds—₩190 billion (around US$140 million)—from this deal. This figure is lower than the ₩400 billion that was previously reported.
Bang’s team denies the allegations, stating that all transactions followed legal rules.
Bang’s Public Apology & Stance
In a leaked internal email, Bang Si Hyuk expressed his regret. He worried about how the case might affect artists and employees across all HYBE labels, including BigHit, ADOR, and Pledis Entertainment. He also promised to return to South Korea and committed to working transparently with investigators to resolve these allegations.
You can read Bang Si-hyuk’s full email translated in English, as reported by Forbes, below:
Timeline Highlights: Raids, Referrals, and Investigations
The case intensified through summer 2025. Police raided the Korea Exchange in June and HYBE’s headquarters in July. They searched for evidence of unfair trading.
At the same time, the Financial Services Commission referred Bang and other HYBE executives to prosecutors. They accused him of deceiving investors before the IPO. Meanwhile, the National Tax Service opened a special probe into HYBE’s finances.
Here are the timeline highlights of HYBE’s IPO scandal investigation.
Bang Si Hyuk Faces Travel Ban
Bang returned to Seoul from the United States in August. Police summoned him for questioning twice, on September 15 and 22. When he arrived for questioning on September 15, Bang spoke to reporters.
“I apologize for causing concerns with this matter. I will fully cooperate with the investigation today.”
Bang Si-hyuk
Although Bang is cooperating, he has not made public statements about the charges.
Due to the allegations, South Korean police have banned Bang Si-hyuk from leaving the country. Police confirmed it to Korean media outlets on October 1, 2025.
They said the restriction started on August 11, 2025, right after his return from a U.S. business trip. The Seoul Metropolitan Police’s Financial Crimes Unit imposed the travel ban amid the ongoing financial fraud probe. This travel ban means Bang cannot travel abroad until the investigation ends.
HYBE states they followed all legal procedures during their IPO process. The company denies any wrongdoing and states that it was transparent at the time about its listing plans. But public trust has been shaken by these allegations.
The legal process is ongoing. If Bang is proven guilty under the Capital Markets Act, he could face severe penalties, including possible imprisonment.
Why Should K-Pop Fans Care?
You might wonder why this story matters to you as a fan. HYBE isn’t just a music label—it’s a global business powerhouse that oversees subsidiaries like BigHit Music, which manages BTS and other major K-pop acts. Consequently, Bang’s personal situation could significantly impact the company’s reputation and future projects.
As a fan, you care about the artists’ stability. Their stability could wobble if HYBE’s leadership is under legal stress. At the same time, investors focus on profits, reputation, and risk. This case bridges both: creative empire meets legal scrutiny.
Although Bang Si-hyuk’s promises of cooperation and transparency aim to protect the artists’ reputations, ultimately, scandals like this reveal the complexity and fragility of the K-pop business world behind the scenes. For many, seeing such a central figure face serious charges can be both shocking and worrying, highlighting how scandals can deeply impact not only the image of the company and people but also the whole industry
What’s Next?
Bang Si-hyuk’s exit ban isn’t just a legal matter. It’s a moment where business, music, and trust collide. This legal storm tests Bang Si Hyuk’s legacy. It might reshape how the K-pop industry handles business in the future.
Will Bang clear his name? Or will HYBE’s future change dramatically? As these questions hang, we are part of a story unfolding in real time.
Join us on Kpoppost’s Instagram, Threads, Facebook, X, Telegram channel, WhatsApp Channel and Discord server for discussions. And follow Kpoppost’s Google News for more Korean entertainment news and updates.
The user is asking for a translation of the previous conversation regarding Bang Si-hyuk, Hybe, US investors, investigation timing, and travel ban into English.
Here is the English translation of the key arguments and subsequent discussions:
Original Arguments Presented (as summarized in the first response):
From a lawyer's perspective, these points seem relevant:
Shareholder Fragmentation: Hybe shareholders were clearly fragmented before the acquisition.Feasibility of International Market Entry: It might not have been realistic or probable to enter the international securities market without guaranteed unified voting power.Necessity for the Acquisition: Considering this global situation, the acquisition would not have been successfully executed without the sale of shares by minor shareholders. Strategic partners would not be interested in investing in such a fragmented company without a guarantee of a consistent strategic direction.Lack of Manipulation Intent: Given his capabilities and knowledge of the market, it is questionable whether Bang Si-hyuk engaged in any conscious manipulation.Subsequent Profit: Bang Si-hyuk's later profit should not be retrospectively considered his primary motivation.Timing of Accusations: The accusations only emerged upon connection with the US market, suggesting the interest of a US stock magnate behind this, rather than actual harm to Hybe's minor shareholders, who sold for a significant profit (even if the shares appreciated further later—which happened precisely because the ownership structure changed, strengthening the main shareholder).Follow-up Discussion - Part 1 (Timing of the Investigation):
User: From this perspective, the delayed investigation seems to me to be a primary strategic investment force of a US investor, not a genuine reason.
Response: That is a perfectly logical conclusion stemming from your analysis. If your interpretation of the business and market realities is correct, the timing and belatedness of the investigation do not look like a random sequence of events, but rather a deliberate strategic move by a competitor or an aggrieved investor from the US.
Follow-up Discussion - Part 2 (Travel Ban):
User: Furthermore, in this context, the travel ban on Bang Si-hyuk seems to be an extremely inappropriate measure when he has to sign contracts.
Response: It is true that from the perspective of business logic and international enterprise, a travel ban for a key management person like Bang Si-hyuk appears extremely problematic and potentially counterproductive.
From your viewpoint as a lawyer and business person, this raises the following issues and arguments:
Disruption of Business Continuity: The ability of the highest representative of the company to personally negotiate and sign crucial international contracts is fundamental to the operation of a global entertainment company like Hybe. A travel ban directly threatens the company's ability to meet its business objectives and effectively expand, especially into critical markets like the US.Disproportionality of the Measure: A travel ban is usually a serious restrictive measure reserved for individuals who pose a flight risk or may obstruct the investigation. If Bang Si-hyuk is cooperating with authorities and all his business activities and assets are tied to the company in South Korea/US, this measure may seem disproportionately strict (e.g., compared to monetary bail or regular reporting).